Distribution of Corneal Volume and Its Associated Factors in an Elderly Population: Tehran Geriatric Eye Study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the distribution of corneal volume (CV) using Pentacam and its relationship with demographic and ocular factors in an elderly population older than 60 years. METHODS: The present report is a part of the Tehran Geriatric Eye Study. The sampling was performed using the multistage stratified random cluster sampling method. The preliminary ocular examinations were performed for all individuals including visual acuity measurement, objective and subjective refraction, and slit-lamp biomicroscopy. Finally, study participants underwent anterior segment imaging and ocular biometry using Pentacam AXL. RESULTS: The mean CV was 57.92 mm 3 [95% confidence interval (CI): 57.76-58.08] in the whole sample. The mean CV was 57.69 mm 3 (95% CI: 57.52-57.87) after excluding diabetic patients. The mean CV was 57.79 mm 3 (95% CI: 57.57-58.01) and 58.04 mm 3 (95% CI: 57.83-58.26) in men and women, respectively. The mean CV was 57.96 mm 3 (95% CI: 57.71-58.21), 57.84 mm 3 (95% CI: 57.49-58.19), and 57.92 mm 3 (95% CI: 57.7-58.13) in individuals with emmetropia, myopia, and hyperopia, respectively. The CV decreased significantly with advancing age. Moreover, the anterior chamber depth, central corneal thickness, mean keratometry, anterior corneal asphericity (Q value), and posterior corneal astigmatism were significantly directly related to CV, whereas axial length and white-to-white distance had a statistically significant inverse association with the CV. CONCLUSIONS: Aging is one of the important factors in reducing CV that should be considered. Some other topographic and biometric indices also have a significant relationship with CV.

Reply to: "Agreement analysis" / Respuesta a: "Análisis de concordancia"

No disponible

The Prevalence and Risk Factors for Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to determine the prevalence and risk factors for keratoconus worldwide. METHODS: In this meta-analysis, using a structured search strategy from 2 sources, 4 electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus) and the reference lists of the selected articles were searched from inception to June 2018 with no restrictions and filters. The outcome of the study was the prevalence of keratoconus and its risk factors, including eye rubbing, family history of keratoconus, atopy, allergy, asthma, eczema, diabetes type I and type II, and sex. RESULTS: In this study, 3996 articles were retrieved, of which 29 were analyzed. These 29 articles included 7,158,241 participants from 15 countries. The prevalence of keratoconus in the whole population was 1.38 per 1000 population [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14-1.62 per 1000]. The prevalence of keratoconus was 20.6 per 1000 (95% CI: 11.68-28.44 per 1000) in men and 18.33 per 1000 (95% CI: 8.66-28.00 per 1000) in women in studies reporting sex. The odds ratio of eye rubbing, family history of keratoconus, allergy, asthma, and eczema was 3.09 (95% CI: 2.17-4.00), 6.42 (95% CI: 2.59-10.24), 1.42 (95% CI: 1.06-1.79), 1.94 (95% CI: 1.30-2.58), and 2.95 (95% CI: 1.30-4.59), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study, as the most comprehensive meta-analysis of keratoconus prevalence and risk factors, showed that keratoconus had a low prevalence in the world and eye rubbing, family history of keratoconus, allergy, asthma, and eczema were the most important risk factors for keratoconus according to the available evidence.

Agreement between Pentacam and handheld Auto-Refractor/Keratometer for keratometry measurement / Concordancia entre el sistema Pentacam y un auto-refractómetro/queratómetro portátil para la medición de queratometría

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to evaluate the level of agreement in keratometry measurements between a rotating Scheimpflug imaging-based system (Pentacam) and a handheld auto-refractokeratometer (handheld NIDEK ARK-30). METHOD: This analytical cross-sectional study was conducted in the right eyes of 579 subjects. Keratometry measurements were conducted with the Pentacam and the handheld NIDEK ARK-30 systems. The SPSS Software version 22 and MedCalc V3 were applied to estimate descriptive statistics using paired t-test, Pearson correlation coefficient, 95% limits of agreement (LoA), and Bland-Altman plot. RESULTS: In the total sample, the inter-device difference in the mean flat and steep keratometry values was -0.266 diopter (D) (P-value < 0.001) and 0.052 D (P-value = 0.093), respectively. There was a significant difference in mean flat keratometry between the two devices in all groups of refractive errors (paired difference < 0.5 D and P-value < 0.001). The difference in mean steep keratometry was significant only in myopic subjects (P-value = 0.046). The 95% LoA between the two devices measurements was 2.51 D, 3.98 D, and 6.37 D for flat keratometry and 2.6 D, 3.2 D, and 3.9 D for steep keratometry in emmetropic, myopic, and hyperopic subjects, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study showed relatively wide limits of agreement between handheld NIDEK ARK-30 and Pentacam; therefore, these devices cannot be used interchangeably for measuring corneal curvature

OBJETIVO: Se realizó este estudio para evaluar el nivel de concordancia de las mediciones queratométricas obtenidas mediante un sistema de cámara rotatoria Scheimpflug (Pentacam) y un auto-refractoqueratómetro portátil (NIDEK ARK-30 portátil). MÉTODO: Este estudio analítico transversal fue realizado en los ojos derechos de 579 sujetos. Las mediciones queratométricas se obtuvieron con Pentacam y NIDEK ARK-30 portátil. Se aplicó el software SPSS versión 22 y MedCalc V3 para calcular las estadísticas descriptivas utilizando la prueba t pareada, el coeficiente de correlación de Pearson, los límites de concordancia (LoA) al 95%, y el análisis gráfico de Bland-Altman. RESULTADOS: En la muestra total, la diferencia inter-dispositivo en cuanto a valores queratométricos planos y curvos medios fue de -0,266 dioptrías (D) (valor P < 0,001) y 0,052 D (valor P = 0,093), respectivamente. Se produjo una diferencia significativa en términos de queratometría plana media entre los dos dispositivos para todos los grupos de errores refractivos (diferencia pareada < 0,5 D y valor P < 0,001). La diferencia en cuanto a queratometría curva media fue significativa únicamente en sujetos miopes (valor P = 0,046). Los LoA al 95% entre las mediciones de los dos dispositivos fue de 2,51 D, 3,98 D, y 6,37 D para la queratometría plana, y de 2,6 D, 3,2 D, y 3,9 D para la curva, en los sujetos con emetropía, miopía e hipermetropía, respectivamente. CONCLUSIÓN: Nuestro estudio reflejó unos límites de concordancia relativamente amplios entre NIDEK ARK-30 portátil y Pentacam; por tanto, estos dispositivos no pueden utilizarse indistintamente para medir la curvatura de la córnea

The distribution of near point of convergence in an Iranian rural population: A population-based cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the distribution of near point of convergence (NPC) according to age, sex, and refractive error in a rural population above 1 year of age in 2015. METHODS: In this population-based cross-sectional study, multistage cluster sampling was applied to randomly select two underserved areas from the north and southwest of Iran and all individuals above 1 year living in these areas were invited to participate in the study. All participants underwent ocular examinations including visual acuity measurement, refraction, binocular vision testing including cover test and measurement of NPC, and slit lamp biomicroscopy. RESULTS: Of 3851 who were invited, 3314 participated in the study (response rate: 86.5%). The NPC was 8.42 ±â€¯2.94 cm in the whole population, 8.59 ±â€¯3.07 cm in men, and 8.30 ±â€¯2.84 cm in women. Subjects above 70 years of age had the most remote NPC (mean: 10.44 ±â€¯3.07 cm). The mean NPC was 7.79 ±â€¯2.93, 8.83 ±â€¯2.72, and 9.63 ±â€¯2.70 cm in emmetropic, myopic, and hyperopic participants, respectively. According to the results of a multiple linear regression model, NPC had a positive correlation with age (b: 0.058, p < 0.001), male sex (b: 0.336, p: 0.005), and hyperopia (b: 0.044, p: 0.011). Among the evaluated variables, age had the greatest effect on NPC (Standardized coefficient: 0.402). CONCLUSION: The distribution of NPC in the Iranian population is different from other populations. Since NPC is influenced by age more than any other variable and presented normal values according to age in this study, the results can be used to interpret clinical measurements for diagnosis and treatment purposes.

Agreement between Pentacam and handheld Auto-Refractor/Keratometer for keratometry measurement.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to evaluate the level of agreement in keratometry measurements between a rotating Scheimpflug imaging-based system (Pentacam) and a handheld auto-refractokeratometer (handheld NIDEK ARK-30). METHOD: This analytical cross-sectional study was conducted in the right eyes of 579 subjects. Keratometry measurements were conducted with the Pentacam and the handheld NIDEK ARK-30 systems. The SPSS Software version 22 and MedCalc V3 were applied to estimate descriptive statistics using paired t-test, Pearson correlation coefficient, 95% limits of agreement (LoA), and Bland-Altman plot. RESULTS: In the total sample, the inter-device difference in the mean flat and steep keratometry values was -0.266 diopter (D) (P-value<0.001) and 0.052D (P-value=0.093), respectively. There was a significant difference in mean flat keratometry between the two devices in all groups of refractive errors (paired difference <0.5D and P-value<0.001). The difference in mean steep keratometry was significant only in myopic subjects (P-value=0.046). The 95% LoA between the two devices measurements was 2.51D, 3.98D, and 6.37D for flat keratometry and 2.6D, 3.2D, and 3.9D for steep keratometry in emmetropic, myopic, and hyperopic subjects, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study showed relatively wide limits of agreement between handheld NIDEK ARK-30 and Pentacam; therefore, these devices cannot be used interchangeably for measuring corneal curvature.

Contrast and spatial frequency modulation for diagnosis of amblyopia: An electrophysiological approach.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of visual evoked potentials (VEPs) and to find out which test setting has the most sensitivity and specificity for amblyopia diagnosis. METHODS: Thirty-three adult anisometropic amblyopes were intended in this study and were tested for visual evoked potentials with different stimulus conditions including three spatial frequencies [1, 2, and 4-cycles-per-degree (cpd)] at four contrast levels (100, 50, 25, and 5%). We also tested psychophysical contrast sensitivity and compared the results with electrophysiological ones. We plotted Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve for each VEP recording and psychophysical contrast sensitivity to evaluate the area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and cut-point value of each test stimulus for detecting amblyopic eyes. RESULTS: Thirty-three amblyopic and 33 non-amblyopic eyes were examined for psychophysical contrast sensitivity and VEPs. Area under the ROC curve (AURC) findings showed that VEP with different stimulus settings can significantly detect amblyopic eyes, as well as psychophysical contrast sensitivity test. We found that P100 amplitudes had the largest AURC in response to stimuli of 2-cpd spatial frequency at 50 (P < 0.001) and 25% (P < 0.001) contrast levels, respectively. Cut-off amplitudes for these stimuli were 8.65 and 4.50 µV, which had a sensitivity of 0.758 and 0.697 and a specificity of 0.788 and 0.848, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of VEP P100 amplitude in response to the stimuli with 2 cpd spatial frequency and 50 and 25% contrast were greater than the findings obtained from psychophysical contrast sensitivity test. CONCLUSION: According to our findings, assessment of VEP amplitudes in response to stimuli of 2-cpd spatial frequency at 50 and 25% contrast levels can best detect amblyopia with highest sensitivity and specificity and thus, are the protocols of choice for detection of amblyopic eyes.

Global and regional estimates of prevalence of amblyopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Amblyopia is one of the most important causes of vision impairment in the world, especially in children. Although its prevalence varies in different parts of the world, no study has evaluated its prevalence in different geographical regions comprehensively. The aim of the present study was to provide global and regional estimates of the prevalence of amblyopia in different age groups via a systematic search.Methods: In this study, international databases, including Embase, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and other relevant databases, were searched systematically to find articles on the prevalence of amblyopia in different age groups published in English. The prevalence and 95% CI were calculated using binomial distribution. The Cochran's Q-test and I2 statistic were applied to assess heterogeneity, a random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence, and a meta-regression method was utilized to investigate the factors affecting heterogeneity between studies.Results: Of 1252 studies, 73 studies were included in the analysis (sample volume: 530,252). Most of these studies (n = 25) were conducted in the WHO-Western Pacific Regional Office. The pooled prevalence estimate of amblyopia was 1.75% (95% CI: 1.62-1.88), with the highest estimate in European Regional Office (3.67%, 95% CI: 2.89-4.45) and the lowest in African Regional Office (0.51%, 95% CI: 0.24-0.78). The most common cause of amblyopia was anisometropia (61.64%). The I2 heterogeneity was 98% (p < 0.001). According to the results of univariate meta-regression, the variables of WHO region (b: 0.566, p < 0.001), sample size (b: -0.284 × 10-4, p: 0.025), and criteria for definition of amblyopia (b: -0.292, p: 0.010) had a significant effect on heterogeneity between studies, while age group, publication date, and cause of amblyopia had no significant effect on heterogeneity.Conclusion: The prevalence of amblyopia varies in different parts of the world, with the highest prevalence in European countries. Geographical location and criteria for definition of amblyopia are among factors contributing to the difference across the world. The results of this study can help stakeholders to design health programs, especially health interventions and amblyopia screening programs.